May 18, 2007
Name That Celebrity: Cheap-Ass Extensions Edition
It’s been a while since we’ve had a round of “Name That Celebrity,” so here’s a little diversion for your Friday afternoon: can you guess the proud owner of the lovely head of hair* in the above photograph? Three hints as to who it is NOT:
1. Angelina Jolie in “Gone in Sixty Seconds”
2. Adam Duritz photograph negative
3. The Albino twins from “Matrix: Reloaded”
*Also possibly tumbleweed, frayed rope, grain chaff, and/or broom bristles.
The big reveal, plus more of the golden-tressed mystery celeb after the jump
Surprise — it’s Britney Spears! And she looks like ASS! Bet you didn’t see that coming!
13 Comments, Comment or Ping
Osbourne Black
Dayum! That is one ratty-ass weave.
May 18th, 2007
litelysalted
I quickly scrolled down to the first photo and thought, “Who the fuck is that? It kind of looks like Britney, but even uglier…” I guess all of that clown makeup she slathers on her face daily actually is an improvement. I’ll be darned.
Oh, and by the way: Good for you, Brit! You have hair now! And it totally doesn’t look like shit at all. Man, she waits ’til she’s got an inch an a half of hair to play with, and in goes the motherfucking weave. Jesus Christ.
PS: I have VS shorts kind of like that and my 30 year old ass looks hella better in ‘em. Suck on that, troll!
May 18th, 2007
Shauna
Wow! You can tell that her hair is still barely more than fuzz by the ’sideburn’ five o’clock shadow in the side view picture. It looks like those extensions would hurt!! I bet it is uncomfortable to have all that weight glued onto a few stubby hairs. Yeow! As for Brit’s attire, I guess she is attempting to bring back leggings- (but with cork wedgies?)
I know it is a Victoria Secret campaign slogan, but I recall that Pink came to her defense a few months back and for some reason I think she may be trying to ‘thank her’ for her support. Talk about wearing your heart on your ……..
May 18th, 2007
Kathy
WHY does she keep trying?!?!
Retire already Brit- you’re all washed up!
May 18th, 2007
bionic bunny
you know, she’d be almost cute with short hair.
and LEGGINGS? was she even alive in the late 70’s/80s?
May 18th, 2007
enzogirl
That is horrifying! Sad & scary-and she is smiling?! I guess Brit can’t see the back of her head. Gluing on fake hair to those stubs must feel itchy & heavy. Her wigs looked better. I actually feel sorry for the poor girl-she has truly lost her mind.
May 19th, 2007
Grumpy Smurf
The leggings are bad enough but come on, why leave the price tag? Makes me think she had a lot of bruises to cover or she didn’t shave/wax.
May 19th, 2007
LuLu
The back of her head looks like the aftermath of my Barbie Hair Massacre of 1987…..and in the second picture, she kinda looks like a younger, sluttier, coked-out Bonnie Hunt.
Is it wrong that I enjoy following the psychological - and consequently, the aesthetic - demise of another human being?
May 20th, 2007
hilda
Damn, I think I prefer the Dollar Store wigs.
May 20th, 2007
MES
I don’t think you need to born in the 70’s to appreciate a pair of leg warmers, especially the calf length before or after dancing to PREVENT cramps, pulls, and such. There’s a lot to pick on where Brit is concerned but geez , I challenge any of you go to a professional dance studio and bust your ass for an at least an hour and half (that’s how long a class typically is, rehearsals can be 30 minutes to six hours) then go out to deal with the photogs. I am sure you’d be dewy fresh, sweet smelling glamour pusses.
May 21st, 2007
LuLu
Oh, is that what it is? She looks like shit because of all the dancing!! Not the partying, or the drugs or booze, or coming home at 3am to ignore her children and shag some D-grade Paris/Lindsay/Nicole/Whoever cast off, all the while dealing with her sad, creepy descent into the land of plain ol’ tabloid fodder. Remind me never to take up dancing, if that’s where it leads……
May 21st, 2007
Jill
I feel bad for Britney…I mean, we all go through hard times. It just sucks that hers were in the public eye. At least she’s trying to get herself back on track, it seems. As for the extensions…I was also wondering why she doens’t just go the “Short Hair” route. I think it would be kind of cute! And I definitely don’t think she’s chubby anymore. She’s had two kids…I think she looks pretty good!
May 21st, 2007
Ginger
You need a pretty face to pull off extremely short hair, and Britney is no Halle Berry or Natalie Portman. Her bone structure is quite unremarkable.
Oh, and MES, who wears wedge-heels to the dance studio?
May 21st, 2007
Reply to “Name That Celebrity: Cheap-Ass Extensions Edition”