1. 

   nikita

   so she got them at fourteen? when she was a school kid who didn’t want to be in showbiz?

   May 22nd, 2009

2. 

   Jon

   You women realize most men don’t actually care. It’s all about the shape, not the size.

   May 22nd, 2009

3. 

   Nooken

   I’m with Jon on this, shape is way more important than size… oh and availability to my hands.

   Plus, those pics don’t really look like fakies, just youngies. They’re pert ’cause she’s 22 right?

   May 22nd, 2009

4. 

   kate the great

   I’m voting “real” on those. My boobs look pretty much exactly like that, and I’m 28. They’re just perky!

   May 22nd, 2009

5. 

   chris wade

   uh, those are real. i hate how all these loser dudes say an actress has fake breasts when there is a normal looking slope at the top. fake ones mostly don’t ever have that downward slope from the top of the breast. plus, that would be way too much pressure for a young girl to put on herself because so many people would be focused on them instead of other things. trust me, i’ve seen a lot of fake ones vs. real ones and only once or twice i still don’t know, but most fake ones even the really good fake ones, are still distinguishable. whoever posted this blog should be fired because only semi professionals and higher should have a right to make claims like this, but a semi pro-pro wouldn’t make an ignorant claim unless they had better pictures to back the claim up. post some nude pics of her breasts with a clear shot, not vanessa hudgens, or miss california quality, but some really clear shot of her breasts and i guarantee they’ll look real. these look way too flat to be fake. and wow, your way of thinking they’re fake is because they’re spaced out? damn, fake ones don’t ever have that much space and if you look at the tops of hers, then you can clearly see there’s a slope, which means they’re real. honestly, i like her breasts and didn’t really consider her boneable until looking at these pics. no offense to anybody this may offend other than the poster, but the poster must be a homosexual, an overweight loser who has no experience with females, or porn, or just a jealous female. i admit, i never heard of the fake breast rumor concerning blake, but after looking at these photos, i’ve come to the conclusion that they’re real and it’s sad that the person posting this blog can’t see that from these pics. i just hate ignorant claims like these, unless they have definitive proof to back their claim. another claim is that diane kruger has fake ones because she looks different from her modeling pics then she does in troy. if you look at the shape from the side of her breasts you can see the downward slope and the underhand curve, which indicates “real breasts.” not to mention she gained about 15 pounds for the movie and german girls really aren’t insecure enough to get fake ones because they’re the ones who are blessed with the big natural ones. i just would like it when men can start determining real from fake because i can and i’m 22. if a man can’t, he must be gay, or still living at his mom’s house.

   May 23rd, 2009

6. 

   Allie.

   Holy shit Chris Wade, you need a hobby. I got about four lines into it, couldn’t read the rest of what spewed onto my page but you and your knowledge of fake boobs is actually pretty off the mark.

   “I’ve seen a lot of them”… oh right, in porn I take it? You can get different shape implants in accordance to whether you would want the stuck on look, or a tear drop implant which gives the slope. Twat.

   Other that that, I don’t care. Blake Lively has awesome hair!

   May 25th, 2009

7. 

   Random Person

   NOT NECESSARILY TRUE. I have implants but my boobs are still spaced far apart…the only time I get decent middle cleavage is with a one-size-too-small underwire bra. Most saline implants result in the boobs still maintaining the same shape and overall appearance, just a lot bigger. If she lacked cleavage and/or her boobs were spaced far apart prior to augmentation surgery, then her boobs would most likely remain far apart after surgery. So no, this isn’t proof that she’s all natural, sorry.

   Jun 30th, 2009

8. 

   CJ

   It’s BS. I don’t even like Blake Lively but when the breasts are apart from each other it doesn’t necessarily mean they are implants. I have natural 34D breasts looking exactly the same and I’ve never had implants. You need more common sense.

   Aug 28th, 2009

9. 

   OMFG

   I think they’re real. She’s aways been busty, even in Pants. She was only sixteen in the first one so they could still be growing at that point. There are also pictures out there when she’s “unsupported” and they don’t look that big. Check this out:

   http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/55/20090825bostona04.jpg

   That was taken a week ago. You can hardly see any cleavage. Unless she has discovered some magic implants that she can deflate and re-inflate at will, I’m inclined to think they’re real.

   Sep 5th, 2009

10. 

    steve

    Obviously this blog was written by a horny, 14 year old who has never seen a real, live pair of breasts in person yet. She’s 24 years old for chrissakes, of course her funbags are going to be defying gravity!!!

    As for being far apart, guess again. She is just not wearing a bra Einstein, and they are at almost perfect placement. She is just a goddess with very little (if any) flaws.

    Trust me, I’m practically a doctor…

    Oct 2nd, 2009

11. 

    Freeman Stehno

    WoW SEX-TAPE with Blake Lively!!

    WebCam video from Hotel here:

    http://blake-lively-tape.blogspot.com/?id=34468735&s=y

    Oct 9th, 2009

Reply to “S.S. Blake Lively Got Breast Implants”