Britney Spears Without Photoshop for Candies

Tags: , , , , , ,

I don’t know what kind of illusion she thinks she’s shattering here (we all know that in real-life she looks like this) but Britney Spears has agreed to allow the unretouched images from her Candies shoot to be released alongside the digitally-altered ones that went to print. The Daily Mail says

Imperfections that can be clearly seen in the [above] un-airbrushed shot include blemishes on her calf [and] larger thighs. The airbrushed picture, however, tell a different story with a slimmed-down waist and flawless, skinny legs.

Meanwhile, in the un-airbrushed shot [below], she has areas of cellulite on the back of her thighs, a tattoo on her lower back (sometimes called a ‘tramp stamp’) is clearly visible and her backside is a little out of shape.

However, in the altered photo all of these imperfections have been wiped out – and she appears to have a pert rear, unrealistically smooth skin, slimmer legs and the tattoo has vanished.

Also noticeably absent? Her camel toe (I circled it in the before picture and drew an arrow to it in the after picture with my totally boss photoshopping skillz). I don’t know when it became a crime to have labia, but guilty as charged. You might as well have airbrushed out Cindy Crawford’s mole or Kelly Clarkson’s third chin. Selling her puss is all Britney Spears is really known for.

Ten more unretouched photos:

7 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. spatz

    it that’s all the photoshopping they did then that’s not bad at all. she looks almost the same in the before just a little tweaked.

  2. Jon

    Why put her in the magazine at all? There’s like a $1 million dollar photoshop bill in there and everyone knows she’s a lindsay lohan-esk crazy mess.

  3. anony

    I’d still do her, no photoshop necessary.
    But a full body condom might be…

  4. dev

    The advertisement industry is making some boldly terrific steps towards some type of normalcy in the protrayal of REAL women.

  5. stephanie

    She looks so much more attractive in the unedited ones. Honestly. She looks real.

  6. Alista

    u can kinda see that shes not really a slut its wht ppl make her

  7. Gregg

    SHE LOOKS GREAT untouched! she is naturally pretty, just one and two touches to her body! but hey she has two kids!!!

Reply to “Britney Spears Without Photoshop for Candies”