Faggot extraordinaire Perez Hilton posted a picture of a panty-less Miley Cyrus exposing her crotch as she stepped out of a car on his Twitter yesterday, saying:
“If you are easily offended, do NOT click here http://i46.tinypic.com/2zre4pv.jpg Oh, Miley! Warning: truly not for the easily offended!”
And by “the easily offended,” I assume he meant “the police,” because Miley Cyrus is only 17 years old, which would make pictures of her vagina very illegal under current child pornography laws. Except, upon further investigation, she actually IS wearing underpants. The dress she’s wearing is white, and you can totally see the outline of her knickers through the material (I took the liberty of circling it for you in the photos below). And just like that, the chance for Perez Hilton to spend the next six months in prison slips through the fingers of the American justice system like so many handfuls of Astroglide. I guess we’ll have to settle for him living inside the prison that is his own heart, just like the retard in “Sling Blade.”
Somebody needs to put that fag outta his misery.
LOL @ Faggot extraordinaire. I love how UN-PC you are.
Miley Cirus’ head looks like a half-deflated basketball that someone hit with a frying pan.
While you’re at it, hit Perez Hilton’s big fat noggin, too.
This untalented SKANK couldn’t have an original though…sex tape on the way I am positive!
If he wants to land in jail so he can get some Bubba lovin’, he’s going to try harder than that.
you do know 18 – up it’s child pornography in canada … ?
i mean, isn’t child pornography .. ****:s
dropboxthemovie.com for sex tapes.
I don’t know what you mean to say that Perez will fall through the American Justice System, because even though Miley was wearing underwear, Perez photoshopped that picture to imply that she wasn’t. It is still distribution of child pornography if you post a photoshopped photo. I would love to see his ass in jail, because he is the biggest American criminal in the country. I can’t believe this guy hasn’t been beaten to a pulp yet. Patience, grasshopper!
Even if the image is doctored or altered in some way it is still a felony under current law. Perez Hilton can still be held accountable for posting what is child pornography
You all need to STFU… Perez is a pig and an ogre but he did not Photoshop shyt… Miley is a whore… Plain and simple. Call it what you like. But she’s walking around and performing more than half-naked, singing about not being tamed, talking shyt about people who have more talent in their azz-hair than she does her entire being, kissing girls, performing lap dances for men old enough to be her father’s father, posting naked pictures of herself online and walking out in public with no undies on, and you hypocrites are bashing a blogger who’s job it is to make fools out these over-paid, self-righteous thoughtless bytches, who feel entitled to everything? Please… This is the great US of A… If a talentless tramp like Miley can pass herself off as being 17 years old, then Perez Hilton can post whatever the FAWK he wants… Freedom of speech mofos… Cuz this trick is NOT 17 yrs old.
Nice photos
lol child porno? are you kidding me. But her doing that vanity fair cover was ok because it was vanity fair rigth? or those pics the girl posted of herself ?? Go after actuall criminals
and keep up the gay bashing people. That will make people take you all the more serious right?
where can i see the full pic
Barbaraa
you have no clue what the hell your talkin about!!!! its only kiddie porn if it invovles a minor engaged in a sexual act or suggest a sexual act,,for example,, had miley touched herself down there during the photo,, or did pelvic thrusting ( most of u idiots call that dancing for some reason) then there would be grounds for charges,, but!!! in canada you can photograph any age nude!!!!! just not sexual!! this is up to interpitation! nude yoga is not sexual but falls under art!!! ALTHOUGH I’D QUESTION THE MOTIVES OF ANYONE PHOTOGRAPHING NUDE CHILDREN,,,it is not illegal!! the law briefly said it was,, which made every photo of a nude baby in a bath tub, or on a carpet illegal!! parents everywhere were guilty!! so the law was revised!! untill a bc judge made kiddie porn LEGAL to posess in canada until the rest of the country said FUCK YOU!! THE IDIOT SAID THAT PHOTO’S OF THIS TYPE WERE UP TO INDIVIDUAL ARTISTIC TASTE’S!! british columbia is all too well known for its pedophiles and rapists!!!!! so again the law was fixed after that bc judge fucked it up!! SO IN GENERAL…AS LONG AS THE INTENT OR SUBJECT MATTER IS NON SEXUAL,, IT IS LEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and finally,, does it surprise you that a gay male like this fag whould prey on a child for his fame,, he sure seemed to take notice of a lil underage nudity!!!! maybe he’s just made that it wasnt justin bieber he got a peek at!!!!!!!!! perez hilton is an abomintion! id like to drag him by his neck behind my 4×4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yes i know my spelling and gramar are awful today!!! im tired annoyed and i have a broken hand ,, but the drugs are good so im happy ,, sorta lol anyway!! miley,,,who cares!!
perez hilton!! you and george michael should hook up,, two old school fags swappin stories(and i dont wanna know what else) in bathroom stalls while lil kids wander in and out!!!!! why do i hate fags like you again?!?!? hmm the mature and respectable gay population i have no issue with,, but perez hilton is another story!!!! i tell him to grow up im a gay basher!! why,, as a fellow human,,and a man i feel its my responsiblilty to speak up when someone,, particularly a fellow man is making us look bad aa a gendre!!!!!! if you cant stand for whats right then why do we care??
It is interesting and informative article. Thank you.
It is interesting and informative article. Thank you.
Darren Chaker’s Thoughts on Perez & Miley
1. There is Nothing Offensive of Taking a Photograph of a Person in Public or Informing Others of Information Available to The Public.
A. Photography is Speech.
First and foremost, photography is speech. Areas open to the public are open for photography since they are a public forum. A “public forum” refers to a public place historically associated with free expression. United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171, 176-77 (1983); Perry Educ. Ass’n v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n, 460 U.S. 37, 45 (1983).
B. There’s No Expectation of Privacy in Public or What is Exposed to the Public.
As relevant here getting out of a car in public is not invasion of privacy. The law most commonly recognized examples of diminished expectation of privacy include streets, sidewalks, and parks. Grace, 461 U.S. at 177; Warren v. Fairfax County, 196 F.3d 186, 191 (4th Cir. 1999) merely taking photographs of a minor is in public not offensive. “Offensive” conduct was defined in Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 7 Cal. 4th 1, 26 (1994) (offensiveness depends on “the degree of intrusion, the context, conduct and circumstances surrounding the intrusion as well as the intruder’s motives and objectives, the setting into which he intrudes, and the expectations of those whose privacy is invaded”). Put another way, the law in California is clear – “there can be no privacy with respect to a matter which is already public” and therefore “there is no liability when the defendant merely gives further publicity to information about the plaintiff that is already public.” Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Co., 154 Cal. App. 3d 1040, 1047 (1984). It is not at issue that the photographs were taken in public as it is not an issue Miley decided to expose herself to the public.
Simply put, since the photographer took a photograph (free speech) in public (no expectation of privacy) there is nothing wrong with the taking of the photograph. The next question is, does Miley exposing herself while getting out of a car constitute child porn?
C. Does The Momentary Exposure of a Minor’s Genetalia in Public Constitute Child Porn?
No. Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography. 18 U.S.C. §2256 indicates the image of the minor must include “sexually explicit conduct”. Sexually explicit conduct is defined under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256) as actual or simulated sexual intercourse (including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex), bestiality, masturbation, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.
Simply getting out of a car is not sexually explicit—it’s getting out of a car.
Conclusion:
Caveat. Miley exposed herself, which is against the law. If a male exposed himself, women would be running to dial 911, and police would arrest the man for indecent exposure. However, since it’s Miley, it’s not against the law, just a free show where no ticket is required, and is likely a promotion for her new single “You Can’t Tame Me”!
Darren Chaker
i love that its illegal in the usa to look at stuff like this because shes under 18,but im english and 16 in this country lol,i would fuck her little 17 year ols pussy up
the big dog
if you want to go to jail send a pic of you nake to a cop!!