Sarah Jessica Parker’s Mole is Back for SATC 2

Tags: , , , , , ,

sarah jessica parker mole

To mole or not to mole: that is the question on the set of the Sex And The City sequel. The Daily Mail says

[After] the actress had a procedure last summer to have her famous mole removed, it seems the make-up artists on set have had their work cut out for them.

While filming yesterday, the brown beauty mark could clearly be seen back in place on her chin, which seems to have been applied for continuity.

Parker was filming a flashback scene yesterday as she stepped into an Eighties outfit of skinny jeans, an off-the-shoulder jump and Converse trainers, complete with permed hair… depicting the then-twentysomething character’s arrival in New York in the Eighties.

Well, fan of the mole or not, I think we can all agree on one thing here: Dee Snider from Twisted Sister has never looked more beautiful. Zing!

“Buck Melanoma. Moley Russell’s wart. Not her wart. I’m… I’m the wart. She’s my tumor”:

sarah jessica parker mole 1sarah jessica parker mole 2sjp mole 3sarah jessica parker mole 4sarah jessica parker mole 5sjp mole 12

sarah jessica parker mole 6sarah jessica parker mole 7sarah jessica parker mole 8sarah jessica parker mole 9sarah jessica parker mole 10sarah jessica parker mole 11

PHOTO SOURCE: Bauer-Griffin, Splash News

Moley Russells Wart

Tags: , , ,
r-kelly.jpg

R & B singer R. Kelly’s case took a turn for the worse yesterday when his own mole defense was used against him. Kelly’s attorney had argued that since the man in the sex video did not have a mole on his back, that man could not be Kelly. Brilliant defense, except the man in the video did have a mole. D’oh! According to the The Daily Mail

Video forensics expert Grant Fredericks froze several frames of the sex tape where a dark spot was visible on the man’s back. For comparison, Fredericks showed the jury a still photo taken of Kelly’s back after his arrest in 2002, revealing a dark fingernail sized mole. “There is a mark on the man’s back in the exact same position,” Fredericks said, referring to the tape.

Kelly and his attorneys looked grim and dejected during the expert’s testimony, while prosecutors looked pleased, appearing to smile as they sat at their courtroom table.

One Memorex VHS tape — $5.39. Two bottles of Schlitz for a full bladder when urinating on a thirteen-year old girl — $10.50. Attorney’s fees for statutory rape defense — in excess of $100,000. Your primary defense argument back-firing and proving the prosecution’s case — priceless. There are some things money can’t buy. For everything else, there’s maximum security prison.