^{More of her showing off the tattoos she wore in 2009′s “The Town”}

Whoever hacked into Blake Lively’s cell phone and leaked all those nekkid pics online got a little incensed after her publicist publicly announced that the photos were “100% fake” and that “Blake has never taken nude photos of herself,” because he leaked several more photos last night (albeit not as naked, but with a whole lot more visible face) and now these pics surfaced this morning, all tagged with the mocking caption “Oh, yes, Blake’s rep. These are totally fake. We really, really believe you. Want moar? BTW, thanks for all the faps.” Or in layman’s terms, “PWNED, biyatch!”

UPDATE: Photos have been removed at the request of Blake Lively’s attorneys.

Five pics of a supposedly nude pre-Gossip Girl (and pre-nose job) Blake Lively surfaced this evening, and I’m inclined to believe they’re the real deal. A) The facial mole matches up, and B) it’s the same iPhone she was photographed with last year. Also, my grandma once told me if I believed in something hard enough, I could make it be. I think she was talking about me getting my GED, but I’m hoping it works for naked celebrity pictures, too.

UPDATE: Photos have been removed at the request of Blake Lively’s attorneys.

I wouldn’t take Vanessa Hudgens for the shy type. I’d just assume if you’re willing to do a spread-eagle into a camera lens, you’re not exactly a shrinking violet. But apparently I’m wrong! Says Digital Spy,

Vanessa Hudgens has said that it was “embarrassing” speaking to lawyers after a photo scandal in which nude pictures of her were circulated on the internet.

Last month, more shots were posted online, with one allegedly showing Hudgens kissing Zoey 101 star Alexa Nikolas.

Speaking on Capital Radio, Hudgens revealed that she found it more embarrassing discussing the leak with her lawyers than with her parents.

“The more embarrassing thing is talking to the lawyers and attorneys about it but, whatever, you deal,” said the High School Musical actress.

Hudgens also discussed her belief in spiritual crystals, saying: “I wear them around my neck on necklaces and stuff.”

I guess it would be kind of awkward (and difficult) to find professional replacement words for “lesbian tongue action”, “spread-open pussy shot” and “Myspace-style nude self-portrait”. Try putting those words down on a legal statement.

The interwebs are exploding this morning (and by that I mean a bunch of unemployed 40-something-year-olds who spend all their time looking for nude celebrity pictures are all simultaneously masturbating) to new nude pictures of Vanessa Hudgens. I, of course, am excluded from the pathetic rabble in their perverted exultation. I post these pictures purely to comment on the sad state of today’s youth and their need for exhibition. That being said, you can count on me to post the uncensored pictures when they become available. I’ve been combing the internet for them since the wee hours of the morning.

Also seen kissing Nickelodeon star Alexa Nikolas. It seems the Disney whore factor is catching:

Now I can cross “Google Betty White nude” off my “Things I’ll Never Do” list. My parents must be so fucking proud right now.

Have you ever said to yourself, “You know, there’s a startling absence of Kanye West dong in my life?” Well, your wait is almost over, dear readers! Radar Online says:

Kanye West has been embarrassingly caught with his pants down in a nude photo scandal.

The self-snapped pictures of the music icon’s private parts were reportedly sent to a number of women, and are now for sale and being shopped to various media outlets.

One image shows a nude Kanye from the chest up, while the second photo shows the singer’s genitals provocatively exposed from his boxer briefs.

I don’t know how one “provocatively” exposes their wiener. What, is it winking coyly at the camera? Giving its best come-hither stare? Wearing a see-through negligee and pouting? I guess if you’re Kanye West, even your genitals have to showboat.

As soon as the wiener pics make their way to the interwebs I’ll post them, but for now, enjoy these staged photos of Kanye conveniently “running into” Kim Kardashian while she films her stupid show in NY:

PHOTO SOURCE: Fame Pictures

Even though she’s denied they exist, the first of several naked photos of Jersey Shore’s Snooki has been made its way onto the interwebs via the magical portal known as NakedSnooki.com. The photo in question shows Snooki on all fours but strategically covered, and sucking in with vengeance only previously seen courtesy Britney Spears and a can of Cheez Whiz. Radar Online says

RadarOnline.com has seen several photos and they appear to be genuine. The background of the photos matches the background of photos Snooki has released via Twitter – and the background is her bedroom.

There is also a short video that exists. Most of the photos are strategically posed, hiding much of Snooki’s body.

The people in possession of the photos have chosen to remain anonymous so far. But they have registered a domain name and put the photo on a Web site, where RadarOnline.com has viewed it.

It is the one of the set of photos previously seen by RadarOnline.com.

Good God. I’ve never seen skin that color in my life. It’s like a cross between Donatella Versace and a well-oiled catcher’s mitt. Although from a distance, you’d really be hard-pressed to tell either of those two things apart.

Can we officially rename Twitter to Twatter? Maybe Lenny Kravitz was getting jealous off all the attention that’s been directed recently to Nicole Alexander, Rihanna and Cassie, but whatever the reason, he decided to post a picture of his naked ass on TwatPic TwitPic. However, there’s something patently gay about a man posing for nude pictures, let alone posting them. I suppose I can’t really complain, with all the titties and tacos flying around, it’s kind of refreshing to get a little man-meat in on the action.

A (NSFW) thirty-year old full-frontal photograph of Madonna and what appears to be a small yak is now available to the highest bidder, thanks to Christie’s auction house in New York. People Magazine says

[The] head of Christie’s photography department says Madonna was a financially strapped 20-year-old dancer when she responded to photographer Lee Friedlander’s newspaper ad seeking a nude model. Her fee: $25.

Playboy published six photos from the shoot in 1985, though the one going on sale is “maybe the most explicit one.”

I did the math, and if your date to the senior prom bought you dinner, your puss went for more than Madonna’s did. Hell, if he just bought you a decent corsage. Or if he bought a pack of Trojans and two bottles of Boone’s Farm. Or even a shovel and a bag of lime for the guy you mowed down after those two bottles of Boone’s Farm. You can’t put a price tag on dignity, people!

Topless and therefore tasteful here; puss and therefore pornographic (NSFW) after the jump:

(more…)