I thought it was ironic that Pamela Anderson would show up in leather to a PETA event, but it turns out that’s actually just her skin. I wonder how many PETA activists flour-bombed her before they finally realized their gaffe.

In Berlin with camel toe:

After stripping down for their “I’d Rather Go Naked” campaign three years ago, Khloe Kardashian has decided to end her relationship with PETA. She wrote on her official blog:

I’m sure you all heard [that Kim was flour-bombed last week], and I just received word that the woman responsible has very close ties to PETA, despite PETA publicly stating otherwise. Not only has PETA lied to the public, but they have proved that they support this kind of behavior. I’ve been a vocal supporter of PETA for a long time but I have also been very vocal about anti-bullying, so this was a huge disappointment for me. As you all know, I don’t condone violence and bullying and what happened last Thursday was just that. I am absolutely disgusted by their behavior. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and opinions — I personally don’t wear fur but that doesn’t mean I am going to force my views on anyone else, ESPECIALLY by violating them. I am a very proud sister right now, because Kim handled last week’s incident like a champ. She got cleaned up and was back out there in a matter of minutes. Go Kimmie!

We all need to practice what we preach. I will still continue to NOT wear fur, but I will no longer support PETA. Bullying and harassment is NEVER a solution, and I won’t be a part of any organization that thinks otherwise.

Oh, come off it already. PETA has been flour-bombing people since 1985. The word “flour bomb” is practically synonymous with PETA. Throwing red paint and flour on people is what they do. What Khloe’s actually saying here is that none of that really mattered until it happened to her personally.

George Clooney’s latest piece of ass Elizabetta Canalis allowed PETA to release unretouched nude photos of her for their latest anti-fur campaign. The Daily Mail says:

The 32-year-old model and TV host stripped off for the charity’s latest anti-fur adverts in which she posed completely naked in front of a simple blue background.

‘I think this is the best reason why I got naked in my life,’ Elisabetta said.

That is a good reason to get naked. As opposed to getting naked because — oh, I dunno… let’s say because you’re so drunk you’ve soiled yourself and your husband refuses to let you in the house unless you hose yourself down in the front yard first. Now that would be a bad reason to get naked. I learned that lesson the hard way last Cinco de Mayo.

Academy Award nominee Taraji P. Henson is the latest celebrity to strip down for PETA’s tired-ass “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign. The caption says that she is “comfortable in her own skin,” which is a good thing, because she’s clearly not comfortable in her own hair. If that weave were any more obvious, it’d still have the price tag and a Korean woman attached.

At the premiere of Karate Kid last summer:

PHOTO CREDIT: Fame Pictures

Oh goody! Rihanna’s new perfume has landed the seal of approval by PETA. She should celebrate by eating a burger! Says Digital Spy,

Rihanna’s new fragrance Reb’l Fleur has been approved by animal rights activists at PETA.

The singer, whose scent will be available from January 25 in the US, has been praised for refusing to use a corporation that tests products on animals.

PETA senior vice president Dan Mathews sent the 22-year-old a big bouquet of flowers to thank her for considering animals.

He told WENN: “Rihanna’s decision to team up with Parlux is as kind to animals as her music is to your ears.

“By renouncing animal tests, Parlux is proving that beauty doesn’t have to have an ugly side.”

Yeah yeah, except I’m pretty positive those places that don’t do animal testing are using the knowledge gained by others who have. If they really want to be completely animal-friendly, they shouldn’t stand on the shoulders of others and then turn around and point self-righteous fingers. They should start at the very beginning and use humans like Kim Kardashian, Lindsay Lohan and Snooki as their test-subjects. It’s about time they made themselves useful.

Going to Fred Segal:

Photo source: Fame Pictures

It’s fitting that a man with enough foresight to legally change his name to his Bengals uniform number (in Spanish, no less!) would also be wise enough to champion animal rights by holding a LEATHER FOOTBALL in front of his wang. Those tattoos of his must double as irony-repellent.

Kim Kardashian can’t resist posting pictures of herself with her tits hanging out, so of course this photo went up on her Twitter page yesterday. But this time, people seemed less interested in her fake boobs and more concerned about the poor cat dangling five feet off the ground. PETA said in a written statement

“Kim Kardashian… mistakenly thinks that because a mother cat picks up her kittens by the scruff of the neck that a supportive hand under the rump isn’t needed.”

But Kim was quick to defend her photo, writing on her official blog:

I have been getting negative comments regarding the way I was holding the kitty, but rest assured, the owner and vet were on set and showed me how to pick him up. The cat was not harmed in any way and is perfectly fine! I love animals and would never do anything to harm any animals.

And in her defense, I’m sure when she sees something black, she instinctively feels she has to get underneath it. We can’t fault her for that. It’d be like getting mad at a retard for having an extra 21st chromosome.

Shopping in Sydney in — you guessed it! — a skin-tight minidress:

PHOTO SOURCE: Pacific Coast News

It’s not news that PETA is made up of a bunch of radical, deranged lunatics who act first and ask questions later, but this is hysterically inept, even for them.  They used an unauthorised picture of Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, in their latest idiotic anti-fur ad.  From People:

The latest ad, titled “Fur-Free and Fabulous!”, surfaced today picturing First Lady Michelle Obama– alongside Carrie Underwood, Oprah Winfrey and Tyra Banks– without the White House’s knowledge. When contacted, Semonti Stephens, a spokeswoman for the First Lady, tells PEOPLE of the ad campaign: “We did not consent.” As far as Mrs. Obama’s feelings about the PETA cause in general, Stephens says only, “Mrs. Obama does not wear fur.” PETA’s response? “The fact is that Michelle Obama has issued a statement indicating that she doesn’t wear fur, and the world should know that in PETA’s eyes, that makes her pretty fabulous,” the organization’s president Ingrid Newkirk told the press.

Oh sweet Jesus, PLEASE tell me this means the Secret Service gets to set PETA on fire.

On an unrelated note, what the HELL is going on with Tyra Banks in that photo?  She looks five times more like an alien than she usually does.  Her skin isn’t even a regular human colour.  She’s mauve!  Can the Secret Service set her on fire, too?  Better safe than sorry, and whatnot.

A new PETA ad featuring Playboy cover girl and a “Dancing With the Stars” regular Joanna Krupa in nothing but a crucifix has got the Catholic church all up in arms. Fox 411 says

Krupa is seen topless and bottomless in the latest spot by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, her private parts covered — barely — by a large, well-placed metallic crucifix.

“It’s totally inappropriate,” the Catholic League President said in a statement. “The fact is that cats and dogs are a lot safer in pet stores than they are in the hands of PETA employees. Moreover, pet stores don’t rip off Christian iconography and engage in cheap irreligious claims.”

I’m glad that the Catholic Church is finally expressing outrage over something that merits this kind of attention. Crucifix-covered vaginas are so much more socially impacting and significant than, say, a chronic instances of child molestation at the hands of the practicing clergy. Good on the Catholic Church for finally taking a stand on the important issues.

Joanna on her way to DTWS:

PHOTO SOURCE: Pacific Coast News

^{Click images for NSFW versions}

I’m glad PETA has finally seen the light and done something that can actually resonate with the non-psychotic-and-hopelessly-misguided rest of us normal people. We could give a shit about the way the Colonel fries his chicken or how many crepuscular rodents have to die to make one floor-length chinchilla coat, but we really, really care about boobs. In fact, the only thing we seem to care about more than boobs are vaginas. 260 million pages of archived erotic content can’t be wrong!

Keely from the back:

Some chick you’ve never heard of before from the “Twilight” series got naked for this PETA ad (click header for NSFW version). Try not to wet your pants from excitement. The NY Daily News says

Expressing solidarity with all things cute and cuddly, 19-year-old Christian Serratos appears in the woods of what looks like none other than Forks, Washington. This appearance makes Serratos the youngest person to pose naked in a PETA ad.

So talking about taking pictures of increasingly younger naked teen girls is okay now? That’s good to know. My parole officer is always acting like it’s some kind of social faux pas to bring it up in dinner conversation. Only his words were more like “direct violation of Federal Child Exploitation Laws” and “felony charge and a minimum of five years in jail.” That guy really needs to get with the program.

At the Nylon magazine launch party a few months back:

PHOTO SOURCE: Pacific Coast News

“Dancing with the Stars” Karina Smirnoff is a five-time U.S. National Dance Champion, World Trophy Champion, and Asian Open Champion, as well as the “first woman to ever make the British Professional Final with three different partners.” Well, I once had sex with three different partners in Great Britain. And they assured me they were professionals. A butcher, a baker, and a candlestick maker, as I recall. PETA tried to act like that didn’t count. Hypocrites!

Showing off her engagement ring (before they called off the wedding earlier this month) in a bikini: